<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
 <responseDate>2026-10-23T22:56:28Z</responseDate>
 <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:oar.onroerenderfgoed.be:VIOR002-001" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/oai2.php</request>
 <GetRecord>
  <record>
   <header>
    <identifier>oai:oar.onroerenderfgoed.be:VIOR002-001</identifier>
    <datestamp>2007-10-30T00:00:00Z</datestamp>
    <setSpec>VIOR</setSpec>
    <setSpec>openaire</setSpec>
   </header>
   <metadata>
    <oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
     <dc:title>Steentijd in de Kempen. Prospectie, kartering en waardering van het laat-paleolithisch en mesolithisch erfgoed</dc:title>
     <dc:creator>Van Gils, Marijn</dc:creator>
     <dc:creator>De Bie, Marc</dc:creator>
     <dc:description>The Campine area (‘Kempen’) has for some
time past been known for its large quantity of Final
Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sites. Archaeological
fieldwork of the last few years has revealed that these
sites are rich in artefact numbers and sometimes
very extensive. Most, however, are severely affected
by (sub-)recent human impact on the landscape.
In the undisturbed - mostly wooded - areas, by
contrast, possible artefact scatters are invisible. Until
recently, therefore, these areas were considered unfit
for archaeological survey. This article presents a
systematic survey of these landscapes with appropriate
drilling campaigns, using drills of 20 cm diameter
and screens with a 3mm mesh. The goal of the
project is to systematically assess the archaeological
value of the Campine region in order to select sites
for protection. This program should also allow for
a better prediction of archaeological potential in
infrastructure or land management operations.
The project had two phases. The first phase
took place in 2001 and consisted of
1) the inventory
of known sites (including input into the Central
Archaeological Inventory),
2) the re-localisation in
the field of a selection of these sites, and
3) a survey
for new sites. The latter only took place in areas
where good preservation conditions were likely, i.e.
places with more or less intact (podsolic) soil profiles,
mostly in forests. This approach appeared to be quite
successful. In areas selected on the basis of their
geomorphologic and topographical characteristics,
drilling often delivered artefacts. As such, a series of
formerly unknown sites could be detected. They are
well-preserved under vegetation covers and mostly
situated in specific geographical contexts: on high dry
sandy soils next to (former) open water (river or fen),
providing new insights into prehistoric land use.
During the second phase, an assessment of potentially valuable sites took place. In the summers of 2002
and 2003, five selected site complexes were screened
systematically: Ravels-Witgoor, Opglabbeek-Ruiterskuilen/Schaapsven/Turfven, Lommel-Maatheide,
Lommel-Molse Nete, and Arendonk-Korhaan. These
locations were selected because of their archaeological
potential and the variety of management situations,
i.e. from acutely threatened sites to locations in normally well-protected nature reserves. On each of these
sites, several hectares were systematically sampled in
a 5 by 6 meter grid. This approach provided sufficient
information without destroying the sites in any way.
One of the striking results of the assessment phase is
that the sites are in no way restricted to isolated artefact scatters representing single occupations. Rather,
they contain chains of scatters over hundreds, if not
thousands of meters, generally along open waters.
In all, the study provided new knowledge on the
location, preservation, wealth, extension, and nature
of Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic site complexes
in the Campine area, and presents a new approach
that can be used for further systematic surveys of
prehistoric flint scatters in Flanders in order to better protect this very vulnerable part of the archaeological heritage.</dc:description>
     <dc:publisher>VIOE</dc:publisher>
     <dc:date>2006-01-01</dc:date>
     <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/report</dc:type>
     <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
     <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
     <dc:identifier>https://id.erfgoed.net/infocat/publicaties/202</dc:identifier>
     <dc:identifier>https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/VIOR/2/VIOR002-001.pdf</dc:identifier>
     <dc:source>Van Gils M. &amp; De Bie M. 2006: Centrale Archeologische Inventaris (CAI) II. Thematisch inventarisatie- en evaluatieonderzoek, VIOE-Rapporten 02, Brussel, 7-16.</dc:source>
     <dc:source>ISSN 1781-4936</dc:source>
     <dc:language>nl-BE</dc:language>
     <dc:rights>Copyright VIOE</dc:rights>
     <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
    </oai_dc:dc>
   </metadata>
  </record>
 </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
